Alienation 

Man naturally seeks more power to overcome his weakness in nature and achieve greater conveniences. Higher power is obtained by greater knowledge. But, gaining knowledge is neither easy nor a quick process. On the way to make greater conveniences, a man often gives subjective determinations to unknown phenomena in nature that suit him well. If such determinations do not come into direct conflict with nature, a man readily accepts them as real and realizes conveniences from it the same way as he really overcomes his powerless in nature. In this manner, an alienated knowledge from objective reality is created. This is the basis of my theory of alienation. 

Authorities often deliberately create an alienated knowledge to achieve supremacy in society. Dominion is one of the highest forms of alienation because, in the subjective consciousness of man, power gives an impression of superiority in nature. Once the man thinks he has more potential than he objectively deserves, he realizes the illusion of great conveniences.  

To establish power over people, the authorities create ideologies in which they define values in society and rules of joint action. Ideologies can have their justification when the created rules prevent chaos in society. That is how all religions and all political systems have been created. The negative side of ideologies stems from the fact that they always support the interests of its creators and provide them with power in society. Thus they alienate the creators of ideologies and people of their own nature. The alienation of society from its own nature cannot bring a good result to society. In fact, the all evil of this world comes from the alienation of society from its nature. 

Good results can come from the equal rights of people only. Equal rights among people will form objective values in society. It will remove the alienation and establish a good society. I have developed an ideology based on equal human rights, but the authorities prevent the formation of equal human rights because they, by definition, take the power of the authorities. Equal rights among people have been oppressed through the whole history of mankind, and that is the only reason a good society has never been established.  

Instead, we have continuous struggles between authorities who are striving to establish power in society. On this planet Earth, there was never enough space for all the people who wanted control over others. That is the reason why envy, hatred, conflicts and wars appear among the alienated people in which the entire nations suffer.  

The Rothschild family 

The Rothschild banking family has recognized long ago that direct power over people may be very inconvenient and came to the conclusion that it could be much more efficient, lasting, and safer to rule by using the money. The banking family Rothschild has developed the ideology of capitalism. Mayer Amschel Rothschild had allegedly said in 1790: "Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes the laws." The Rothschild family makes strategic decisions for society by using the money they have earned by banking and other businesses throughout the generations. They do not bare responsibilities to society for doing that. That is the primary source of alienation in the western world today.  

The Rothschilds continued this tradition by imposing alienated rules to social life and by preventing the natural way of living that could disalienate the world in which we live. Alienation is mostly built up through the political system, through a system of education and through propaganda by the media. The Rothschild family has control over all of these systems by the people they help, finance or employ.  

In the article Has Antichrist come? I wrote about the conspiracy the Rothschild family raised against the whole world. Here I enclose the YouTube video Zeitgeist – The Movie: Federal Reserve, which also presents the basis of the conspiracy theory quite convincingly. The Rothschild family has secretly succeeded in mastering the western world more than any emperor in the history of mankind. That means the power that should belong to the people today is alienated from the people regardless of what form of democracy is established.  

The Rothschild family started financing kings in the 18th century, and in this way, entire kingdoms owed money to them. There is no better job than lending money to the states because then all the citizens pay the debt back through the state taxes with an interest of course. During the Napoleonic wars, Rothschild allegedly manipulated the stock market in England and took the wealth of the people for a bargain. They also managed to establish control over The Bank of England. At that time, the Rothschilds were convincingly the wealthiest people in the world. Today they are nowhere on the list of millionaires. How is this possible? Simply, they hide their wealth and power. 

The Rothschild family is probably the first family that organized its operations all over the world. They could not take care of all the businesses themselves, so they employed expert agents to lead their companies. These agents receive a share in the ownership of companies and become their partners. The Rothschild family probably hired the Rockefeller and Morgan families in the nineteenth century in the United States. If the owners of the world's largest corporations such as Rockefeller, Morgan, and Warburg were independent of the Rothschild family, then they would, according to the competitive nature of entrepreneurs in capitalism, fight with each other but they do not.  

They are one body, and the head is most certainly the Rothschild family because they conquered the business world a century before their partners appeared in it. Through the 18th, 19th and 20th century, the Rothschild family has created an entire hierarchical structure of partners, and they do it today as well. Some call this structure Masons and its hierarchical top Illuminati. During nearly three centuries the Rothschild family and their partners could have bought half of the world, while nobody can know it. 

In 1913, the Rothschilds gained control of the American Federal Reserve Bank with the help of corrupt politicians. This is the central bank in the U.S., and it is privately owned. The bank lends money to the U.S. government and the U.S. people return it with interest through taxes. But not only that, the U.S. spends more money than the Rothschilds, and their partners have at their disposal, so that the American Federal Reserve Bank prints money out of thin air, lends it to the U.S. Government, and then collects it back with interest. This is a masterpiece of deception which has been operating since 1913. 

The Rothschilds have imposed a restrictive monetary policy to practically the entire western world. This policy prevents the governments to issue money to cover their own budget deficit. The justification was found in the fact that printing money creates inflation in which money loses value and money has fundamental importance in the capitalist world. States which perform a restrictive monetary policy must cover a budget deficit with money borrowed from banks and in that way the Rothschilds again collect profits.  

Countries mostly borrow money from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. These are supranational institutions in which the American Federal Reserve Bank has a significant role, influence and interest. That’s how the Rothschilds impose their will over the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Taking into account that many countries are dependent on the help from these banks, the Rothschilds easily impose their will to them. In that way, the Rothschilds rule and exploit almost the whole world. Of course, the state must repay the debts with interest, which usually means that all these countries increasingly borrow money and the Rothschilds become increasingly rich. 

The Rothschilds of course also control commercial banks, which give loans to individuals and companies in the Western world. Most of the people buy houses and cars with credits, companies borrow working capital from banks, and the Rothschilds realize tremendous profits. With the vast amount of money, they purchase valued companies all over the world.  

But that is not all; by controlling the money in the world, the Rothschilds have become masters of the economic crisis in the world. They encourage investments of people with low interest rates. When a private business expands, they raise the interest rate and reduce the amount of money in circulation. This reduces the purchasing power of people and thus deliberately creates an economic crisis. Then companies bankrupt massively, and the Rothschilds cheaply buy those they need. Rothschilds also profit on the increased number of unemployed workers who accept poorly paid jobs to be able to feed their families, and thus bring them more profits. 

Alienation of policy 

Under pressure from international financial institutions, various organizations and media propaganda, most of the presidents of countries around the world obediently follow the interests of the Rothschild family. If some head of state opposes the Rothschild family and decides to defend the independence of the country, then the Rothschild agents can create a civil war in his country. They made the civil war in Yugoslavia. I wrote more about this in the article in My debt to Yugoslavia. The Rothschild agents try to put every country in the world under control, including Russia and China. All the problems in these countries were undoubtedly assisted by the American and British secret services, backed by the Rothschild family. 

In an extreme case of disobedience, presidents of countries lose their lives. As an example, the President of the U.S., John Kennedy, lost his life. The reason for it could be his executive order no. 11110 which closed the system of the Federal Reserve, and ordered the U.S. Government to restore the constitutional mandate over the control of money. Although Kennedy nowhere mentioned the name of the Rothschilds here, you can hear his speech that calls for a fight against the conspiracy. Shortly after that, John Kennedy was assassinated. An investigation of the murder was very doubtful according to Michael Parenti in the article The JFK Assassination: Defending the Gangster State. 

The disobedient President of Romania Nicolae Ceausescu, Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic, the President of Iraq Saddam Hussein and before them many others were also killed. Of course, these or similar cases make governments in the world very obedient. The Rothschild family controls parliaments in the world as well. Please see a very interesting video Israeli lobby in America that shows how the American Israel Public Affairs Committee affects the creation of the US policy. By the control of governments and parliaments, the Rothschild family controls the formation of laws in the world and they, of course, correspond to the family Rothschild business and are entirely alienated from the needs of people. 

The Rothschilds have built an entire hierarchical structure of agents that realize their interests. The senior agents founded the Bilderberg group, which meets once a year to coordinate policies that will be conducted in the western world. The group directs the programs of work to the heads in politics, banking, business, the military and media. These meetings are closed to the public. One should not be particularly bright to understand that such a policy has nothing to do with democracy. It is wholly alienated from the people. These meetings are no longer secret, and that means that the Rothschilds create an elite that allows them to rule the world.  

President Obama attended the meeting of the Bilderberg Group, where he coordinated his program with the needs of the rulers of the world. If he did not do it, he would not get support from his own Democratic Party, without which he would not have had the chance to become the president. After President Bush, Rothschilds wanted a more humane president to tranquillize dissatisfied American people. To this purpose, they agreed to give small concessions to the people, but the policy will not change significantly.  

Obama promised in the election campaign to end the military intervention in Iraq in the first place because there is no need for the war anymore because disobedient Saddam Hussein was removed. Now the Rothschilds need peace to exploit Iraqi oil. They will make it through the corruption of the government, through contracts and loans for the reconstruction of the ruined country.  

Obama also announced the extension of military intervention in Afghanistan on the grounds that such action is necessary to prevent acts of terrorism in the world. I think the reason for the aggression lies in the fact that Afghanistan does not agree to be a colony of anyone and as such cannot be exploited. On account of supporting the aggression against Afghanistan, President Obama likely won some concessions in health care insurance for the US people. That is called a democracy today.

Alienation of economy 

The market economy is based on profits, and therefore it values profits above people. This is an alienation that develops inequality in society and brings injustice in the process of production, the division of labour and distribution of incomes. In case of good enterprise business, the employees generally cannot participate in the division of profits, but in case of a bad enterprises business, workers face lower incomes for sure or a loss of work, and there is nothing they can do. Relations between employers and workers are also not moral because employers are the buyers of work and workers are salespeople of their own work. Thus, the workers become commodities, and that is unacceptable. Given that a man himself in the market economy is not accepted as a value, manufacturers lead shameless exploitation of workers to achieve higher profits.  

Alienation of sciences  

Alienation is thoroughly carried out by education. Throughout history, the authorities of sciences have attempted to define the authenticity of nature by writing an indefinite number of books. But often they were not successful in it so that they alienated their sciences from objective reality. Natural sciences are still satisfactory because their development makes profits. Social sciences are completely suppressed in their development because the change of the social system does not suit authorities. Social sciences should be the carriers of social improvement, but they are so alienated from their sense that they do not even try to find a solution that could improve society. They are useless. If someone tomorrow abolishes sociology, political science, and philosophy as sciences, no damage will have happened. Indeed that would bring benefits to society because people would no longer rely on useless authorities in the field of social sciences. They would start to think with their heads.  

Authorities generally do not need smart people, but obedient followers. They use education to conquer thoughts of students and therefore turn them into tools in their own hands. Authorities keep useless sciences because they support the system in which authorities exercise privileges. It does not matter what ideology is behind it. All the authorities want power and do not allow people to free themselves from it. The evaluation of students' knowledge by the teachers supports the authoritarian system in which authorities have power over people. As a result, education today is alienated from the natural needs of the society. It is very bureaucratic, too long, and unnecessarily complicated.  

Students are forced to accept useless alienated knowledge on which today's alienated society has been built on if they want to be successful students. The more time students spend in school, the more they accumulate alienated knowledge, and the less they can understand the objective laws in society and accept the changing of the social system. Authorities know that, and thus they reassure the alienated order they imposed. Then, authorities recruit the best students, so-called excellences, to implement the policies they were imposed on society. These “excellences” are programmed in a way they cannot accept anything more than cosmetic changes of acquired knowledge.  

Now you may conclude how wrong is the statement that the existing system of education is essential for human development. It is adopted by virtually all the people around the world. The primary function of the system of education is to make people prove that they are obedient followers of authorities and as such, they become eligible to work in an alienated society. The effect of today's education is, in fact, harmful to human development because it alienates students from their own nature and turns them into living machines.  

People who believe authorities and obediently follow them cannot achieve a good life firstly because authorities generally represent their own interests and secondly because by blindly following the authorities they neglect their own senses and abilities to find the correct path. They alienate themselves from their own nature, from themselves. As a result, the social sciences are so unsuccessful today that they cannot recognize my work; the only good solution for humankind and the education is so ineffective today that it prevents people from recognizing my work, the only good solution for humankind.  

The Rothschild family likes useless sciences because they distance people away from real problems, and therefore the Rothschilds strongly support the development of such sciences. With the help of the authorities they kept under control, they control the education system as well. Misinformed people may think that control over education is harmless, but in reality, it creates a severe effect in the formation of the future of humankind.  

Alienation of media

The agents of the Rothschild family do not regret the money they spent to take control over media because by control of media they control public opinion, and after that, they can do virtually whatever want. The Rothschild family started with control of newspapers and then television. You may have noticed how quickly the big television station, CNN, was made for example, and that from the start it had substantial financial resources available and has propagated throughout the world the values that the wealthy people advocates. Such TV stations run "excellences" that are well trained on how to represent the interests of big capitalists while trying at the same time not to confront the needs of the people. The only people who have access to media are corrupted by the system and do not have any intention to change anything there. 

When you think that you have decided on which candidate you will vote in elections, the representatives of the wealthy people have already decided it for you. Everything you know about the candidates has come to you through the media they control. It is not even particularly relevant to the wealthy people what candidate you are going to vote for because all the candidates will implement their will anyway. It is important to them though to convince you that you have the "freedom" to make your own decisions in your life and to make you happy while following their will. They prepare you for your "good" decisions practically from birth, and they do it so cleverly that you cannot even notice.  

Through everyday propaganda, media convince people that money is the biggest if not the only value. Money is a medium of purchase that regulates the market of goods and services, and therefore objectively it is a value, but in today's alienated society this value is much exaggerated. If you think a little bit, you would see that air is undoubtedly more valuable than money, because without air there would not be us. But no one or almost no one considers air as a value mostly because it cannot be privatized and nobody can make money on it.  

Man to man should be the most significant value, but money gives power over the people, which deny the importance of man. Love and friendship are indeed natural values, but money as a value brings out greed that destroys love and friendship. Overestimating the value of money brings alienation in every pore of society and social relations. People who accept money as the highest value under the pressure of propaganda are great enemies to themselves because they act against their own nature and against the nature of the society in which they live.  

Events that are not convenient to the Rothschild family, such as, for example, my philosophy do not have access to the western media, and therefore neither to the people. The media in the world of the west are very uniform and selective in a presentation of events around the world, which indicates that they are under the control of a narrow circle of people. It comes to mind for example that the Serbs were accused of ten years of ethnic cleansing in the former Yugoslavia in virtually all the Western media. At the same time, Turkey committed ethnic cleansing of Kurds that have passed almost unnoticed by the media. As a result, Serbia was bombed due to "public pressure," and Turkey did not suffer any sanctions. What was the essential difference? Serbia refused to obey to dictates from the western world and Turkey is cooperative like most of the countries around the world.  

Since the Internet appeared, the Rothschilds have been trying to have the most considerable influence in this field as well. Their agents purchase influential websites and quickly form new ones in an attempt to take control of the Internet information distribution. Recently I was particularly attracted to the websites change.com, changemakers.com, GOOD.is, etc. All these websites are calling for positive changes in society and are allegedly particularly interested in helping disempowered people on the bottom of the "pyramid." But it is just a mask. Behind all these web sites lies a powerful organization of private sponsors who have their own private interests.  

Changemakers.com has even published some of my articles and accepted two projects of mine in the contests of new ideas: Humanistic enterprises and Democratic anarchy. But they ignore my work. The Rothschilds ignore my ideas, and everyone else’s that propose the real change to the world, and they drown them in a sea of other ideas. Not one idea in the competition at changemakers.com can compare with mine, but “excellences” of the alienated system of education cannot see it. The Rothschilds count on the inability of people that they have raised for generations.  

Also, the Rothschild could have bought half of the world in the last three centuries and thus can directly control half of humankind. The managers of their companies and organizations may not know that they are agents of the Rothschilds, but they know very well that they are privileged and do not want to do anything that might upset their employers. Thus, the Rothschilds prevent the acceptance of new ideas that can improve society. The websites that advocate changes in society together with most of the left media which are sponsored by companies or organizations would most likely stop changes from happening.  

The Rothschilds like the “resistance” provided by the “excellences” they have raised. Naomi Klein, for example, wrote the book "No Logo." In this book, she calls upon people to boycott goods from brands such as Nike, for example, because this emerging multinational corporation thrives enormously at the expense of cheap labour in developing countries. The Rothschilds are very likely the owners of Nike and should not support such writing. So why is her work supported by media and publishers? Because the chance of success of her idea is practically nonexistent. The Rothschilds adore helpless critique and help it. Such ideas give the illusion of freedom of public expression, which directs the society in a struggle that cannot succeed.  

There are many “excellences” that advocate human rights, women's rights, gay rights, the rights of the poor, who are also supported by the agents of the Rothschild family because all these people cannot achieve success in improving this world. They are useful to the Rothschilds because they fill in the public space so much that work which way improve society cannot break through.  

***

If there is a possibility that my work may come closer to the public, then the real power of the Rothschild family arrives on the scene. Two years ago, Google opened a competition inviting good ideas that can change the world. I participated with my project along with more than 150,000 other projects. The winner has been proclaimed after two years, and my work was not among them. Why? Google does not want to accept my ideas because they present the end of capitalism, the very system on which Google has been established. But my project does not threaten Google or its owners in any way. My project will one day inevitably wholly change the world and make it a beautiful place to live. Not accepting such work is immoral. Why is it so important for Google to defend capitalism? I think that the decision about the competition was made above Google. The Rothschilds have significant influences in all companies including Google even if they are not the principal shareholders. The Rothschilds together with their agents defend capitalism at any cost. 

The Rothschild family creates the culture of the whole world as well. If you pay attention, you can notice that all countries in the world overtake a unique fashion, music, film and television program. Thus countries become cultural colonies of the Rothschilds. You can recognize that by the same shows on television like "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire" or "American Idol" airing all around the world. Unique culture creates a unique orientation of people and thus facilitates the work for great manipulators. This culture aims to capture the thoughts of people and not to give them the freedom to think about what is good for them. It will give them "answers" to all their questions and offer them everything they "need."  

Today's culture propagates illusions, immorality, superficiality, kitsch, gossip, violence, cruelty, greed, shallowness, artificiality, and the situation is getting worse every day because the media cannot offer anything better. Today’s society is profoundly alienated from its nature and therefore requires perverted values on its own. It cannot recognize correct values because people have been living without freedom for generations and were systematically prevented from learning how to get rid of those who govern.   

***

The Rothschild conspiracy prevents the development of civilization and degenerates human beings. It is the way to total alienation, to the eruption of dissatisfaction and destruction. The Rothschilds aim to dominate the whole world, and they cannot be satisfied until that goal is achieved. But this goal cannot be completed because not all people can be obedient followers, obedient consumers of ideas, images, tastes, and sounds. This is because people need freedom. People will sooner or later strongly oppose the Rothschilds because by their nature they cannot live in a cage even if it is made of gold.  

Capitalism is profoundly immoral, and therefore there is no hope for it. Also, capitalism is developed to the point where it can no longer achieve enough improvement in society; it is no longer a rational enough system and as such presents obstacle for the development of civilization. In the article End of Capitalism, I have presented why it is time for capitalism to go down in history. I have also introduced the basis of the new system Humanism that will replace it. This system will overcome alienation as well.  

In today's world, the meaning of the word alienation is very underdeveloped. The purpose of this word in the English-speaking world is so suppressed that there is not a word that defines the condition that prevails alienation. The expression which would put society in the opposite position of alienation is non-existent. I use this meaning in my language a lot so that I had to translate it as a “disalienation“ in the English language even though you cannot find it in the English dictionary.

The process of disalienation

There is only one exit from the alienation of today’s society, and that is the establishment of equal rights among the people. There exist only one equal right among people, or they are not equal. Partially equal rights or almost equal rights do not exist because then we are talking about unequal rights. Even slightly uneven rights create privileges with very negative consequences that sooner or later cause problems in society. I have written more about that in the article Privileges are evil. I have defined society with equal rights of people. I think my philosophy is the only right way for humanity. I presented it in my book Humanism - A Philosophic-Ethical-Political-Economic Study of the Development of the Society, which is available free of charge.  

Disalienation of policy 

Even the poorest countries of the world can create an independent economic policy. Such states can accumulate financial resources no matter how small they are and economically compete with powerful countries around the world. Good social policy is primarily based on the democratic will of citizens. Citizens can directly decide that the majority of financial capital, which they possess together, invests in the economic development, while for the purpose of the living standards they could leave a minimal amount of money that is sufficient for survival. This means that these people would give up from any luxury in the period that they consider necessary to develop their economy. In this way, they would lose the dependence they have on private financial centers of power. That would release them from exploitation, from external pressures of any kind, and would make them the masters of their prosperity. It is also a way to a disalienation of society.   

People can directly decide what percentage of their salaries they want to give for taxes. To be clear, individuals will not pay taxes in the amount they want, but they will participate in the formation of the total amount of the tax money, and then the tax money would be collected from people according to their incomes. Furthermore, people will decide how much money from the taxes they want to allocate for: the defence of the state, public security, education, health, housing, recreation, infrastructure, etc. Following the living experience, people will learn how much money they need to spend on taxes and what is the best way to spend it. In that manner, the people will for the first time create the macroeconomic policy of the society directly, and that will constitute the basis for the de-alienation of society. Such a strategy will certainly follow people's needs in the most efficient way, and therefore it will significantly develop society.  

Today, leaders of countries allocate most of the tax money for armies. When people start deciding on the allocation of tax money, the armies will no longer exist and waging wars would be impossible. Once people get the power to directly decide in society, they will be so pleased that they would not let authorities take it away from them anymore.

Democratic anarchy 

The new system also provides a highly efficient method of bearing the responsibility of all people for their deeds. One part of the responsibilities will be based on democratic anarchy. It is a system in which each person gets an equal right to evaluate any other person. A positive evaluation should bring a reward of let’s say one dollar to the assessed person, and a negative rating will carry a fine of let's say one dollar. Let each person receive the right to allocate three positive and three negative evaluations to other people monthly. In such a simple way, each person will get real power in society and therefore will be respected. This measure will direct people to produce the highest possible conveniences to other people and to diminish or abolish the creation of disadvantages.  

The system of democratic anarchy will especially affect authorities. The higher the position of power in society, the greater the responsibility they would have to bear to society. For example, the President of the United States can get 100 million bad evaluations from U.S. citizens for bad politics, lies, and criminal aggression against other countries. This will cost him 100 million U.S. dollars in a single month. Non-privileged presidents would not dare perform bad policies anymore. And if it happens somehow, they would run away from their positions very fast. Only the most skilful and brave individuals would dare lead countries. They will not be authorities anymore, but our servants. I wrote more about it in the article: The Future of Democracy.

Disalienation of economy 

Equal human rights mean every person must have the right to work. Unemployment will be eliminated by shortening working hours proportionally to the rate of unemployment. This would increase the demand for workers on the free market so that employers would have to pay them more. It will remove the exploitation of workers. I wrote more about this in the article: Let’s remove unemployment.  

The system I have proposed offers more market than capitalism can afford. The market for public work posts will be primarily developed. Which means it will open competition of workers for every public job post, including work posts of politicians and the president of the corporations. A worker who offers a higher profit, more goods produced, better, cleaner and cheaper production at any time for any job in public companies, will get the job. I have developed a system that will efficiently valorize the productivity of job offers, harmonize work remuneration and define worker's labour responsibilities. The new division of work is elaborated in detail in my book Humanism. For more on this, please read my article The Future of the Economy.

No economy can be more productive than the one where the best available worker gets each job. Such an economy will easily become significantly more productive than the capitalist one so that capitalism will be forced to go down in history together with the vast alienation it has built. Private companies will join the public companies, and the owners will be adequately compensated. In such a society, authorities would not be able to expand the alienation of society from its very nature.  

Disalienation of Education 

The only thing that is hard for a man to learn is to respect people. This most critical social need simply disappears quickly and easily in any society without matter what kind of education is established. The system of democratic anarchy that I have proposed gives equal power to every man in the community. That power is based on the same right of every person to evaluate any other person. Any positive evaluation would bring a small prize to an evaluated person, and any negative assessment would carry a small penalty. Such a simple measure will make people respect each other. It will build a sound and sane society regardless of the education system.   

People specialize in their knowledge. To acquire specialized knowledge schools are necessary as a means of educating people. In the future, schools will no longer be a place where the authorities bureaucratically determine the curriculum of the learning program, but the learning program will be formed by the interests of students. Schools will no longer be institutions that guarantee the knowledge of students as it is accepted today, but the places where education is accessible. I have proposed a system that will require a great responsibility of workers at their workplaces, far more significant than is the case today. In this system, workers will not dare to compete for jobs they do not have enough knowledge for.  

 Everything else that a man should learn in his life is a product of his interest. When a person has the interest to acquire some knowledge he has no difficulty to do that if the knowledge is accessible. Students will be able to attend whichever classes they want whenever they need in life. I wrote more about this in the article: My clash with sciences.

Disalienation of families 

In the animal world, parents teach young animals the basics of needed knowledge. Human society has moved in a very wrong direction because schools have taken rights to teach children the required knowledge. It is wrong firstly because the school curriculum is alienated from the needs of children. And it is even more wrong because directing children through life should be the task of parents, not schools. Parental love, which manifests itself also through the education of children, is one of the primary conditions of the prosperity of the children and society as a whole.  

For parents to be able to teach children the basics of required knowledge, in the first place, it is necessary that parents have free time that they can dedicate to children. Today parents work all day and practically do not see the kids during the day. From this derives a large number of problems. Shortly after the acceptance of the system that I have proposed, working hours would most likely be significantly shorter so that parents would have far more time to devote to their children.  

Another condition of establishing a proper education in society is that parents carry love towards their children. In today's alienated society, love is rare because the alienated society develops narcissism; an inferior and often somewhat perverted form of love. The lack of love is unusual in the animal world, but in human society it is a prevalent phenomenon because of the enormous alienation in which people live. The lack of love is damage to the development of people and human culture. That is the reason the society in which we live in is terrible. The new system I have proposed will teach people to love, and that will fundamentally change the community in which we live. I wrote more about it in the article Do you love?

The disalienation of society  

The disalienation of society will be realized when all people get equal rights. It will be achieved when all people get equal rights to work at any workplace, when all people get equal legislative, judicial and executive powers in the society through the equal right of evaluation, and when all people get the same right to participate in making decisions of common interest. All these rights are entirely opposite to the rights authorities have established to rule society, and therefore cannot be quickly adopted. But there is no other good way. When people accept equal rights, society will get rid of alienation, and then, this world will be improved beyond the wildest dreams today.

July 25, 2010

Back to Top