Aleksandar Šarović wrote:
 

We need democracy and anarchy in order to make the best social decision making system.

Direct democracy through referendums is a best known system but it is not excellent. It is good because it enables the forming of decisions that a majority of the members of society support. On the other hand, democracy allows the majority to impose their will on the minority which is not good. Besides that, direct democracy may be too complicated because it requires all the people to participate in making decisions and that slows down and makes the process difficult. We need to improve decision making system.

An excellent social system will give more rights to leaders to decide on everything they want but they must not disappoint the people in whose name they made the decisions. Simply, if the leaders know how to make the best decisions for society let them decide in the name of society. The new system will call them very strongly for their responsibilities if they fail in doing so. The new system involves a new measure that gives every individual the equal right to evaluate the doings of every man. If the people decide so, the evaluation right would make a significantly strong impact to evaluated people. The leaders will be very exposed. Making bad decisions in the name of society would result with a large number of negative evaluations which would hurt them strongly, thus, they would not dare to make decisions that confront the wish of the people. Such a system would be fast, just, and effective. That would be the democratic anarchy, the best possible political system.

If the leaders would not be able to take responsibility about what the best choices for society are, they would call for direct democratic decisions of the people through referendums. That would lower their responsibilities but would not release them from it because the people may still evaluate them for many reasons. For example the people may express their satisfaction or dissatisfaction by giving the evaluations about the way how they prepare the referendums. This is very important too. The result of it must be some kind of consensus made through cooperation between leaders and people. This is the best possible political system.

 Back to Top